MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529458714 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt16.165

Numerical Study on Small-Scale Fire Whirl using Large Eddy Simulation

2016· article· en· W2529458714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsScale (ratio)Large eddy simulationComputer scienceMarine engineeringAerospace engineeringEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyEngineeringPhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fire whirl is a rotating fire with either a fixed or revolving flame centre-core caused by unbalanced entrainment. In general, the flame height of a fire whirl is significantly larger than that of a free standing fire. It is suggested by several studies that fire whirl is a disastrous scenario especially in urban or bush fires since it can greatly promote the fire spread and escalate the thread to human lives and species. In this paper, as a preliminary study, the fire whirl behaviour has been studied numerically using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) ver 6.1.2 which is based on the large eddy simulation (LES). It incorporates the mixture fraction based combustion model along with soot formation, the subgrid-scale (SGS) turbulence model, radiation transfer equation (RTE) model which are fully coupled and interactive. This allows the modelling of all essential chemical and physical behaviours that occur during the fire whirling processes. A small-scale vertical shaft with a base of 0.34 m 0.35 m with a total vertical height of 1.45 m is considered. The development stages including the ignition, flame-rising and fully-developed fire whirling are modelled successfully through numerical simulations. Fairly good agreements between simulation and experimental results for temperature profiles at the centreline and corner thermocouples are achieved. However, a flame height of 0.3 m to 0.4 m is estimated in the simulation while the experimental observation is around 0.6 m. Also, the temperature is slightly over-predicted at the centre while under-predicted at the corner. These could well be due to the simplified chemistry employed in the FDS. With this preliminary numerical study, it could be logically inferred that the detailed chemical reactions scheme may be needed to capture the fundamental governing characteristics of the fire whirl in future numerical modelling studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it