MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529491168 · doi:10.1002/pc.24217

Enhancement of crystallinity and toughness of poly (<scp>l</scp>‐lactic acid) influenced by Ag nanoparticles processed by twin screw extruder

2016· article· en· W2529491168 on OpenAlexaff
Jesús E. Bautista‐Del‐Ángel, Ana Beatriz Morales–Cepeda, Tomás Lozano, Saúl Sanchez, Shahir Karami, Pierre G. Lafleur

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Composites · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallinityMaterials scienceNanocompositeDifferential scanning calorimetryComposite materialToughnessPlastics extrusionNanoparticleNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly( l ‐lactic acid) nanocomposites based on silver nanoparticles (PLA/AgNP) were prepared by melt blending using a twin screw extruder. Nanocomposites at low concentrations were prepared with 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 wt% of AgNP to enhance the crystallinity and improve the thermal and mechanical properties of PLA. AgNPs smaller than 100 nm which increased the crystallinity of PLA upon the addition were detected by UV–Vis. Crystallinty index of nanocomposites was estimated reaching a maximum of 0.52, where the AgNPs acted as heterogeneous nucleating agent which is correlated with the Ag content. The α and α′ crystals were observed by temperature modulated differential scanning calorimetry and wide angle X‐ray diffraction, thus lattice spacing of more ordered and distorted crystals were corroborated obtaining a higher fraction of α structures when a high content of nanoparticles was added. Moreover, strain at break and toughness of pure PLA were increased from 4.3% to 16.9% and 2.1 to 7.3 MJ/m 3 , respectively, modifying the inherent brittleness of PLA. Finally, with the obtained results a correlation was established where more disordered crystals show less resistance to deformation that lead to an enhancement of elongation at break observed in the nanocomposites. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:2368–2376, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer CompositesSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207