MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529681874 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2016-0210

Enzymatic synthesis of 5-amino quinoline oligomers and evaluation of their free radical scavenging activity

2016· article· en· W2529681874 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali̇ Bi̇li̇ci̇, İbrahim Halil Geçibesler, İsmet Kaya

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDPPHMonomerQuinolineHorseradish peroxidaseRadicalNuclear chemistryOligomerThermal stabilityPolymerizationAntioxidantFourier transform infrared spectroscopyPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compound 5-aminoquinoline (AQ) was treated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H2O2 in a reaction medium containing a dioxane:phosphate buffer mixture (70:30). Products (OAQ) with a degree of polymerization ranging from 4 to 12 were obtained. 1H NMR, FTIR, UV–vis, SEM, TG–DTA, DSC, XRD analysis, and conductivity measurements were conducted for characterization of OAQ. Compared with a monomer, OAQ showed higher thermal stability. After heating to 1000 °C, 46% of the initial weight of the OAQ remained. The antioxidant efficiencies of the monomer and oligomer were evaluated by the typical spectrophotometric method such as the bleaching of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. OAQ showed improved DPPH activity compared with the AQ monomer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207