Review of generic limits of the tiger moth genera Virbia Walker and Holomelina Herrich-Schäffer (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae: Arctiinae) and their biogeography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A phylogeny for Holomelina and Virbia was constructed based on adult morphology. This study included 42 of the 70 recognized species in Holomelina and Virbia, two new species, and two elevated synonyms (H. marginata Druce and V. inversia Edwards). The following outgroups were chosen from the Arctiini: Arachnis picta Packard, Hypercompe permaculata Packard, Paracles fusca Walker, Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linneaus), Pyrrarctia isabella (J. E. Smith), and Spilosoma virginica (Fabricius). Fifty-eight characters (195 states) were described and scored, including several newly discovered characters of the male and female abdomen and genitalia. Three male character systems, the shape and orientation of the basiphallus; the shape, orientation and ornamentation of the endophallus; and the pattern of sclerotization of the eighth male sternite, were important diagnostic characters for smaller clades and species. The maximum parsimony analysis of all taxa with 100 randomized repetitions yielded 779 trees with a length (L) of 1698, a consistency index (CI) of 0.41 and a retention index (RI) of 0.65. Holomelina species were placed in two clades, an H. aurantiaca clade and an H. opella clade that was paraphyletic with respect to Virbia. The ingroup clade comprised of Holomelina and Virbia species was supported by eleven synapomorphies and a Bremer index higher than fifteen. The decay of this node was greater than 10. Taxon jack-knife analyses revealed that results were sensitive to the inclusion of two outgroup species, A. picta and P. fuliginosa. When either was removed the relationships of ingroup taxa became unresolved. When the analysis was restricted to species which represented by both males and females, we recovered an ingroup consisting of Holomelina and Virbia species, but the strict consensus of 123 trees (L = 1356, CI = 0.47, RI = 0.65) resulted in a polytomy of smaller clades. Neither analysis recovered a reciprocally monophyletic Holomelina and Virbia. We place Holomelina as a junior generic synonym of Virbia and provide a species checklist for Virbia. Biogeographic areas were scored from distribution information in a specimen-level database consisting of over 12,000 specimens. The following eight areas were recognized: A. western USA and Canada, B. central USA and Canada, C. eastern USA and Canada, D. southwestern USA and Mexico, E. central America, F. western South America, G. eastern and central South America, and H. highlands of northern South America. A weighted ancestral area analysis was used to determine ancestral areas for five major ingroup clades. We propose replacing the name “probability index” (PI) of Bremer with the term “Weighted Area Index (WAI)” because the PI of Bremer is not based on a statistical distribution and the term is misleadingWe determined that the ancestral area for Virbia was most likely the southwestern United States and Mexico. The species distributed in North America north of Mexico represent a composite fauna with a minimum of two dispersal events from Mexico into the northern latitudes. In contrast, the South American fauna appears to have a single origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".