Institut du droit économique de la mer, Droit international de la mer et droit de l’Union européenne, Cohabitation, Confrontation, Coopération?, Paris, Pedone, 2014.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Droit international de la Mer et Droit de l'Union europeenne, Cohabitation, confrontation, cooperation? est un ouvrage regroupant les textes proposes par les differents intervenants presents lors du Colloque International du droit de la mer, colloque qui s'est tenu les 17 et 18 octobre 2013 dernier au sein du Musee Oceanographique de Monaco, organise par l'Institut du Droit Economique de la Mer (« INDEMER »). Les differents panels composant ce colloque ont pour caracteristique de n'etre quasiment composes que d'universitaires et de personnes travaillant dans la fonction publique europeenne ou internationale, laissant ainsi de cote l'approche « pratique » privee de ce secteur juridique. En outre, ils sont egalement largement domines par des personnes de nationalite francaise ou monegasque, faisant ressortir avec d'autant plus d'importance les quelques personnes membres de l'Europe mais dont la nationalite differe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".