MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

<i>VHL</i>-mutant renal cell carcinomas contain cancer cells with mesenchymal phenotypes.

2013· article· en· W2530236800 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Gedye, Danylo Sirskyj, Nazleen Lobo, Andrew Evans, Neil Fleshner, Michael Robinette, Alexandre R. Zlotta, Robert J. Hamilton, Girish S. Kulkarni, Antonio Finelli, Brenda L. Gallie, Michael A.S. Jewett, Laurie Ailles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellCancer researchBiologyMesenchymal stem cellCancer stem cellCancerCancer cellPathologyMedicineCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4568 Background: To study “cancer stem cells” it is imperative to account for all stromal cell populations within the tumour. The existence of “cancer stem cells” in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has not been examined in ex vivo patient samples. Methods: We established a multiplex flow cytometry (FC) antibody panel in ccRCC, which reliably identified stromal lineages including CD45+ immune, CD31+/CD144+ endothelial and fibroblast-marker-positive subpopulations, thus allowing isolation of "lineage-negative" tumor cells. To verify the identity of tumour-derived populations as either cancer cells or normal stromal cells, we took advantage of the fact that mutations in VHL occur early during ccRCC tumorigenesis and are found in two-thirds of patients. Results: We sequenced 18 patient tumor samples, 12 of which had VHL exome mutations. Targeted re-sequencing of FC sorted subpopulations from these patients’ samples revealed that while CD45+ immune cells and CD31+/CD144+ endothelial cells were genetically normal, a population of VHL-mutant fibroblast-marker positive cells was consistently identified in every patient’s tumour. Immunohistochemistry showed that fibroblast marker-positive VHL-mutant cells do not have the large “clear cell” morphology typical of the majority of the cancer cells in these tumours. When purified and cultured, these fibroblast marker-positive VHL-mutant cells proliferate extensively under mesenchymal culture conditions, but displayed different morphologies to lineage-negative VHL-mutant tumor cells. Functional characterization of these FC sorted cell subpopulations is ongoing, including proliferation, migration, invasion, differentiation and treatment resistance. Conclusions: The phenotype and preliminary functional characterization of these VHL-mutant fibroblast-marker positive cells suggests a mesenchymal differentiation program in ccRCC, with implications for the ontogeny, biology and clinical management of VHL-mutant renal cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→