MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25302550 · doi:10.1021/ja5075739

Cloning and expression of fusion (F) protein gene of Newcastle disease virus (NDV)

2012· article· en· W25302550 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Deshpande Prachi Vijay, K. Kumanan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Journal of Animal Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXhoIBiologyMolecular biologyRestriction enzymeFusion proteinComplementary DNARecombinant DNAInsert (composites)VirologyExpression vectorGeneEcoRIBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was undertaken to amplify, clone and express Fusion (F) protein gene of Newcastle disease virus. The freeze-dried virus of pigeon origin was propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. RNA was isolated from the infected allantoic fluid and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Primers specific to F gene incorporated with restriction enzyme sites, viz. NdeI and XhoI were used to amplify the F gene using cDNA as a template by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The 1680 bp F gene amplicons were gel-purified and first cloned into TOPO vector. Positive clone was confirmed by colony PCR and restriction enzyme digestion. TOPO released insert was ligated with NdeI and XhoI digested pET22b expression vector using T4 DNA ligase and transformed into E.coli. Recombinant clones were selected by colony PCR and restriction enzyme digestion and induced with 0.5 mM final concentration of Isopropyl-1-thio-b-D-galactosidase (IPTG) for the expression of the recombinant F protein. The expressed protein of 55 kDa was obtained during the 4 h post-induction. The obtained recombinant protein reacted with rabbit anti serum in Western blot confirming it to be NDV specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Indian Journal of Animal SciencesSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207