Frequency and Duration of Adrenal Suppression Following Glucocorticoid Therapy in Children With Rheumatic Diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adrenal suppression (AS), a glucocorticoid (GC) side effect with potentially significant morbidity, is poorly understood. The purpose of our study was to determine frequency, duration, and predictors of AS following a gradual taper of GC in children with rheumatic conditions. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted. All patients ages ≤16 years ready to discontinue GC after >4 weeks of therapy were included. Morning cortisol was tested 4 weeks after GC taper to physiologic doses and then repeatedly until normalization. GCs were subsequently discontinued and a low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test was performed. RESULTS: The study was completed by 31 of 39 patients. The median age was 12.9 years and median duration of GC therapy was 39.6 weeks. Seventeen patients (54.8%) had AS. Of the patients with AS, 50% showed recovery by 7 months. Two patients had persistent AS at 12 months and 1 patient at 2 years. A higher maximum GC dose was a significant predictor for the development of AS. CONCLUSION: More than 50% of our patients had AS after GC discontinuation, despite a gradual taper of GC. Stress steroids should be considered in children treated with long-term GC, even after steroid discontinuation, to prevent possible adrenal crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".