Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissertation Abstracts stage presence of the gimp: A study of the complexities of putting disabled actors onstage. Summerville, J. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2014. [PhD Dissertation] United States: Ohio: Ohio State University, 2014. Publication Number: 1702739782. Finding meaning through illness narratives: Latino perceptions of diabetes in a post-industrial American city. Glaser, K.M. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [PhD Dissertation] United States: New York: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2015. Publication Number: 1700219249. Market reactions to businesses' actions towards people with disabilities: Making the business case in the international context. Gonzalez, H. & Araceli, C. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [PhD Dissertation] United States: Texas: University of Texas at El Paso, 2015. Publication Number: 1700787626. Effects of stigma, message valence and virality, and audience characteristics on the persuasiveness of anti-stigma messages via social media. Bie, B. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [PhD Dissertation] United States: Alabama: University of Alabama, 2015. Publication Number: 1701284831. journey toward visibility: A case study of the perceptions of children with disabilities in Honduras. Croyle, C. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [Ed.D Dissertation] United States: Ohio: Ashland University, 2015. Publication Number: 1706308345. Competitive and performance motivation in athletes with disabilities and athletes without disabilities: An investigation of two groups. Newstrom, M.K. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [Ph.D Dissertation] United States: Minnesota: Capella University, 2015. Publication Number: 1707694459. Army of “cripples”: Northern Civil War amputees, disability, and manhood in Victorian America. Padilla, J.O. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2007. [Ph.D Dissertation] United States: Delaware: University of Delaware, 2015. Publication Number: 304869575. Deforming the neighbors: Motherhood, charity, and disability in social settlement literature, 1880–1930. Starnaman, S. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012. [Ph.D Dissertation] United States: California: University of California San Diego, 2012. Publication Number: 1030959614. The harder heroism of the hospital: Union veterans and the creation of disability, 1862-1910. Donovan, B. E. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015. [Ph.D Dissertation] United States: Iowa: University of Iowa, 2015. Publication Number: 1706911795. Who was eligible? public education of children and youth with disabilities in regular classrooms in China from 1986 to 2006. Cui, F. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2008. [Ed.D Dissertation] United States: Massachusetts: Boston University, 2008. Publication Number: 304692444. physically disabled in ancient Israel according to the Old Testament and ancient Near East sources. Fiorello, M.D. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2008. [Ph.D Dissertation] United States: Illinois: Trinity International University, 2008. Publication Number: 304825521.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.468 | 0.170 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".