MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530562202

Returning to homeland: Sigur Ros' Heima and the cultural landscapes of Post-Rock

2010· article· en· W2530562202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lawson Fletcher

Bibliographic record

VenueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandRock artPolitical scienceArchaeologyGeographyLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex ways music sounds out space cannot be reduced to a mirror theory in which the contours of place are simply reflected in music's emotional architectures. Post-rock is a fruitful genre for problematising this notion, as its practitioners are motivated to sonorously re-construct, or at least mourn, the spatial erasures of late capitalism, epitomised by the apocalyptic melancholy of urban redevelopment represented in Canadian ensemble Godspeed You! Black Emperor. Icelandic quartet Sigur Rós maintain a skewed relationship to this primarily American genre, seeming instead to simply evoke the untouched natural beauty of their homeland, fulfilling discourses of Scandinavian 'purity' registered in the perennial critical descriptor for their sound: 'glacial'. Following the band's return to Iceland for a series of free concerts, the 2007 documentary Heima ostensibly affirms Western audiences' perception of their music as little more than the soundtrack to a 'Welcome to Iceland' tourism reel. Yet must things be read this way? This paper considers music's central role in constructing 'geographic knowledge' through a brief history of the affective cartography of post-rock, before critically reading the highly mediated forms - digital documentary, concert spectacle and recorded music - that constitute Sigur Rós' cultural landscape. I highlight the group's revival of the political project of post-rock through their accounting for capital's ecological refuse points, whilst paradoxically questioning their music as reflective of a 'natural' Iceland. Heima, that is, performs a conscious, if contradictory, audiovisual relationship to Iceland, one that is as much motivated by a conservative 'return home' as it is by a need to question one's homeland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSwinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)Same topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207