Complementary Hydrogen Bonding Modulates Electronic Properties and Controls Self‐Assembly of Donor/Acceptor Semiconductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comprehensive investigation of the complementary H-bonding-mediated self-assembly between dipyrrolo[2,3-b:3',2'-e]pyridine (P2P) electron donors and naphthalenediimide/perylenediimide (NDI/PDI) acceptors is reported. The synthesis of parent P2P and several aryl-substituted derivatives is described, along with their optical, redox, and single-crystal packing characteristics. The dual functionality of heteroatoms in the P2P/NDI(PDI) assembly, which act as proton donors/acceptors and also contribute to π-conjugation, leads to H-bonding-induced perturbation of electronic levels. Concentration-dependent NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies revealed a cooperative effect of H-bonding and π-π stacking interactions. This H-bonding-mediated co-assembly of donor (D) and acceptor (A) components leads to a new charge-transfer (CT) absorption that can be controlled throughout the visible range. The electronic interactions between D and A were further investigated by time-dependent DFT, which provided insights into the nature of the CT transition. Electropolymerization of difuryl-P2P afforded the first conjugated polymer incorporating H-bonding recognition units in its main chain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".