MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 17q25.3 Duplication Defines a New Dosage-Sensitive Congenital Neutropenia Locus and Implicates SOCS3 as a Candidate Gene for Cases Unexplained by ELA2 Mutation.

2006· article· en· W2530621468 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew E. Mealiffe, Doan Le, Zhijun Duan, Helen Α. Papadaki, George D. Eliopoulos, Raffaele Badolato, Marshall S. Horwitz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutropeniaBiologyGene duplicationCongenital NeutropeniaCancer researchImmunologyGeneticsGeneChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have investigated the etiology of congenital neutropenia in a girl with de novo duplication of chromosome 17q25.3. She presented during the first year of life with neutropenia, episodic hypothermia, failure to thrive, and other congenital abnormalities. Peripheral blood karyotype demonstrated 46,XX,add(17)(q25.3), and molecular cytogenetic studies confirmed interstitial duplication of chr17-derived material. We excluded ELA2 mutation (the most common cause of hereditary neutropenia) and reasoned that the neutropenia and other medical problems most likely were the result of the chromosomal abnormality. In the duplicated 17q25.3 region, SOCS3 emerged as a promising candidate gene responsible for neutropenia, because SOCS3 is a well-characterized negative regulator of G-CSF-receptor signaling and, in murine conditional knockout models, acts as a physiologic negative regulator of granulopoiesis. As we had previously demonstrated that mutations of the Gfi1 transcriptional repressor are a rare cause of human neutropenia, we searched for potential Gfi1 binding sites in the SOCS3 promoter and noted a total of five, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis validated occupancy of the SOCS3 promoter by Gfi1 in Jurkat, HL-60, and U937 cells. Thus, several lines of evidence suggested SOCS3 as a plausible neutropenia gene. We confirmed that SOCS3 is indeed duplicated in this patient by both FISH and quantitative genomic PCR. In an effort to identify other patients with SOCS3-related neutropenia, we sequenced both exons of SOCS3 in a total of 66 patients with severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) or cyclic neutropenia (CN) and 94 patients with chronic idiopathic neutropenia of adults (CINA) in whom ELA2 mutations were absent. No coding mutations were detected, but we did identify several variants in the SOCS3 promoter and 5′- and 3′- UTRs, including a single base pair substitution (+1779AtoG) in the 3′-UTR in a SCN patient and deletion of a single G (-1318delG) occurring in a six-G tract immediately adjacent to a predicted STAT binding site in a highly conserved region of the SOCS3 promoter (found in heterozygous and homozygous form in several patients with CN and SCN). The 3′-UTR alteration was absent in 270 control chromosomes and is located within a predicted binding site for miR-449 that is well-conserved across mammalian species. In sum, we have identified a patient with congenital neutropenia and a de novo duplication of 17q25.3 defining a new candidate locus for congenital neutropenia, and the evaluation to date suggests that SOCS3 is a promising dosage sensitive candidate gene in this interval that additionally could be a key target in neutropenia associated with Gfi1 mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207