MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530696279 · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.002

SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee

2016· review· en· W2530696279 on OpenAlexaff
Suhny Abbara, Philipp Blanke, Christopher D. Maroules, Michael K. Cheezum, Andrew D. Choi, Bo Han, Mohamed Marwan, Chris Naoum, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Ronen Rubinshtein, Paul Schoenhagen, Todd C. Villines, Jonathon Leipsic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyComputed tomographic angiographyRadiologyDeclarationComputed tomography angiographyTomographyMedical physicsComputed tomographicCoronary angiographyTransparency (behavior)Fractional flow reserveAngiographyCardiologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,060
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomographySame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207