MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530700680 · doi:10.18260/1-2--14020

An Approach To Developing Students' Skill In Self Assessment

2020· article· en· W2530700680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-assessmentProcrastinationPeer assessmentIntuitionContext (archaeology)PsychologyAnxietyComputer scienceApplied psychologyMathematics educationPedagogySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self and peer assessment can be vital parts to any team assessment. The assessment can be of the overall team or of the performance of team members. Assessment is a judgment as to the degree to which a goal has been achieved. In student self assessment, the judgment is made by the student. In this paper the five principles of assessment are summarized. Assessment is about performance not worth; is based on evidence not intuition; is done in a defined situation and for a purpose; is done in the context of published goals, measurable criteria and agreedupon forms of evidence; and is based on multiple forms of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207