MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530734350 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2721

The SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey: 850 μm maps, catalogues and number counts

2016· article· en· W2530734350 on OpenAlexafffund
J. E. Geach, J. S. Dunlop, M. Halpern, Ian Smail, P. van der Werf, D. M. Alexander, O. Almaini, I. Aretxaga, V. Arumugam, V. Asboth, M. Banerji, Jennifer K. Beanlands, P. N. Best, A. W. Blain, M. Birkinshaw, Edward L. Chapin, S. C. Chapman, Chian-Chou Chen, A. Chrysostomou, Charlotte Clarke, D. L. Clements, C. Conselice, K. E. K. Coppin, W. I. Cowley, A. L. R. Danielson, S. Eales, A. C. Edge, D. Farrah, A. G. Gibb, C. M. Harrison, N. K. Hine, D. H. Hughes, R. J. Ivison, M. J. Jarvis, Tim Jenness, Suzy F. Jones, A. Karim, M. P. Koprowski, K. K. Knudsen, C. G. Lacey, T. Mackenzie, G. Marsden, K. McAlpine, R. G. McMahon, R. Meijerink, M. J. Michałowski, Seb Oliver, K. L. Page, J. A. Peacock, D. Rigopoulou, E. I. Robson, I. G. Roseboom, K. M. Rotermund, D. Scott, S. Serjeant, Chris Simpson, J. M. Simpson, D. J. B. Smith, M. Spaans, F. Stanley, J. A. Stevens, A. M. Swinbank, T. A. Targett, A. P. Thomson, E. Valiante, David A. Wake, Tracy Webb, Chris J. Willott, Jorge A. Zavala, M. Zemcov

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsMcGill UniversitySaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie UniversitySt. Mary's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Space AgencyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteChinese Academy of SciencesAcademia SinicaDurham University
KeywordsPhysicsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopeCosmic varianceAstrophysicsGalaxyCosmologyPoisson distributionRedshiftAstronomyCOSMIC cancer databaseStar formationStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a catalogue of ∼3000 submillimetre sources detected (≥3.5σ) at 850 μm over ∼5 deg2 surveyed as part of the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey (S2CLS). This is the largest survey of its kind at 850 μm, increasing the sample size of 850 μm selected submillimetre galaxies by an order of magnitude. The wide 850 μm survey component of S2CLS covers the extragalactic fields: UKIDSS-UDS, COSMOS, Akari-NEP, Extended Groth Strip, Lockman Hole North, SSA22 and GOODS-North. The average 1σ depth of S2CLS is 1.2 mJy beam−1, approaching the SCUBA-2 850 μm confusion limit, which we determine to be σc ≈ 0.8 mJy beam−1. We measure the 850 μm number counts, reducing the Poisson errors on the differential counts to approximately 4 per cent at S850 ≈ 3 mJy. With several independent fields, we investigate field-to-field variance, finding that the number counts on 0.5°–1° scales are generally within 50 per cent of the S2CLS mean for S850 > 3 mJy, with scatter consistent with the Poisson and estimated cosmic variance uncertainties, although there is a marginal (2σ) density enhancement in GOODS-North. The observed counts are in reasonable agreement with recent phenomenological and semi-analytic models, although determining the shape of the faint-end slope (S850 < 3 mJy) remains a key test. The large solid angle of S2CLS allows us to measure the bright-end counts: at S850 > 10 mJy there are approximately 10 sources per square degree, and we detect the distinctive up-turn in the number counts indicative of the detection of local sources of 850 μm emission, and strongly lensed high-redshift galaxies. All calibrated maps and the catalogue are made publicly available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations328
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207