MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2530775485 · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1483

Quantifying mortality of modular organisms: a comparison of partial and whole‐colony mortality in a colonial bryozoan

2016· article· en· W2530775485 on OpenAlexafffund
Danielle Denley, Anna Meta×as

Bibliographic record

VenueEcosphere · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyEcologyPopulationZooidMortality rateDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Comprehensive studies on the population dynamics of colonial organisms require estimates of mortality from the level of the individual module (partial mortality) to the entire colony (whole‐colony mortality), as well as determining the factors that affect mortality at each level of organization. However, accurate measurements of whole‐colony and partial mortality of modular organisms can be difficult to obtain, and few studies involve concurrent measurements of modular and colony mortality. We implemented multiple approaches to measure whole‐colony and partial mortality of modular species using the colonial bryozoan Membranipora membranacea as a model organism. M. membranacea is a cosmopolitan species and of particular ecological significance in the northwest Atlantic, where it is the dominant epiphyte on laminarian kelps and the main driver for the defoliation of kelp beds. Rates of whole‐colony mortality were measured in the field (1) indirectly through repeated subsampling cohort analyses and (2) directly by tagging colonies in situ. Partial mortality of colonies was measured (1) in the field by quantifying the proportion of degenerated zooids per colony and (2) in the laboratory by monitoring loss of colony surface area during seasonal senescence of colonies over winter. Temporal patterns differed substantially between partial and whole‐colony mortality, suggesting that factors affecting mortality of individual modules differ from those affecting whole colonies. Our study indicated that the accuracy of common methods for measuring mortality of modular organisms depends on the species‐specific life‐history characteristics. However, we suggest that rates and mechanisms of whole‐colony and partial mortality can be most accurately quantified by revisiting tagged individuals in situ and recording loss of entire colonies (whole‐colony mortality) and loss of living colony area (partial mortality) between successive sampling times. For M. membranacea, measuring whole‐colony or partial mortality in isolation would overestimate important demographic rates and underestimate the influence of temperature on mortality, respectively. This study demonstrates the need to include mortality measurements from the level of the individual module to the entire colony when quantifying population dynamics of colonial organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcosphereSame topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207