MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Genetic Variations in Genomic HAS1 Direct Aberrant Pre-mRNA Splicing That Generates the Prognostically Significant HAS1Vb Intronic Splice Variant.

2007· article· en· W2530979311 on OpenAlexaff
Jitra Kriangkum, Anirban Ghosh, Brian J. Taylor, Linda M. Pilarski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinigeneExonIntronBiologyRNA splicingExonic splicing enhancerGeneticsSplice site mutationMolecular biologyPoint mutationPolypyrimidine tractExon trappingAlternative splicingMutationRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hyaluronan synthase 1 splice variants (HAS1Va, Vb and Vc) have been previously identified in multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldentsrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM) in addition to HAS1 full length (FL) transcript, and overexpression of HAS1Vb correlates with poor survival in MM (Adamia, et al, Blood2005; 105(12): 4836–44). Unlike HAS1FL that has 5 exons, the aberrantly spliced HAS1Vb transcript excludes exon 4, but retains the last 59 bp of intron 4. Sequence analysis of HAS1 intron 4 (2.1 kb) in MM and WM, but not in B-CLL, reveals frequent point mutations and other genetic variations in genomic HAS1 from bone marrow and blood (Adamia et al, submitted). Intronic mutations have been shown to regulate and modulate RNA splicing. Although it is likely that the mutations identified in HAS1 contribute to aberrant splicing events, an in vitro splicing assay was established to confirm that genomic HAS1 from patient DNA directed the aberrant splicing of HAS1 pre-mRNA to generate HAS1Vb. A 3.7 kb long HAS1 minigene extending from exon 3 to exon 5 was amplified from a WM sample in which HAS1Vb was expressed. Sequence comparison of this minigene to the germline indicated two point mutations in intron 4 (G >A at positions 13 and A>G at position 1837 downstream of exon 4), a T insertion within the T’s stretch, 1708 bp downstream of exon 4 and an insertion of 2 extra TTTA repeats, 1861 bp downstream of exon 4. There were no mutations identified in intron 3 of this patient. The minigene was fused to the upstream HAS1 cDNA sequence in a mammalian expression vector, pcDNA3, and transfected into HeLa cells, which do not otherwise express either HAS1 or HAS1 splice isoforms. RNA splicing as determined by RT-PCR indicated that both constitutive and aberrant splicing of HAS1, in particular, HAS1Vb, occurred in transfected cells, indicating a correct assembly of the construct and the presence in HeLa cells of the required spliceosome components. It also suggests that HAS1 minigene sequences used in this analysis provided cis-acting elements required for HAS1Vb production and that the aberrant HAS1 splicing is not restricted by B cell specific trans-acting elements. Site-directed mutagenesis of intron 4 is currently under investigation to determine the significance of each point mutation/insertion in the HAS1 clone studied. In combination with sequence information of HAS1 intron 4 compiled from sequencing data from a large number of MM and WM patients generated in this laboratory, future site-directed mutagenesis and deletion analysis will target on intron 4 subregions where mutations are shown to cluster. Overall, our studies will unveil the essential cis-acting elements that regulate the aberrant splicing of HAS1Vb. Our work to date confirms that intronic mutations in HAS1 direct aberrant HAS1 pre-mRNA splicing to exclude exon 4 and include a fragment of intron 4, thereby generating an intronic splice variant previously shown to correlate with poor survival in MM. This suggests that in MM and WM but not B-CLL, inherited and somatic variations in genomic HAS1 may contribute to early events in the oncogenic processes giving rise to these malignancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→