Staging Strife: Lessons from Performing Ethnography with Polish Roma Women by Magdalena Kazubowski-Houston (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staging Strife: Lessons from Performing Ethnography with Polish Roma Women. by magdalena kazubowski-houston. (montreal: mcGill-Queen's university Press, 2010. Pp. 264, 6 black-and-white photographs, appendices, and maps.)Staging Strife is a rich ethnographic exploration of the successes and failures of a collaborative ethnographic theater project undertaken by a canadian anthropologist with Polish roma women. The book deftly analyzes the multiple positionalities of the participants, including the author, the romani women, and the nonromani Polish actors. All of these interactions are placed in a broader framework of political and economic crisis in post-socialist Poland and pervasive discrimination against roma in all areas of life. reading this book, one can learn a great deal about Polish roma, about the power and problems of theater as a tool of social change, and about the challenges of collaborative anthropology.The ethnographic performance takes place in elblag, a midsized industrial town in northern Poland; the town is plagued by unemployment, but poverty disproportionally affects roma, who are almost all unemployed. The interviews with roma women about hierarchy and historical stereotyping are particularly revealing of their daily humiliations, family dynamics, educational challenges, and health problems; their meager incomes derive from fortune-telling and occasional market sales. Despite poverty and the structural violence they face, these roma women are extremely adaptable and resourceful. Although kazubowskihouston does not speak the romany language (the first and daily language of her informants), she did get to know the women very well; her insights into gender relations and family conflicts are particularly valuable. The romani women provide detailed life histories chronicling non-romani prejudice plus a pointed self-critique of their own romani culture, including early marriage, male privilege, and domestic violence. This critique exists side by side with pride in some romani traditions and rituals such as music, dance, and cleanliness rules.The romani women's evaluation of their own culture as well as their constant exposure to the hostility of non-roma both played a major role in how they wanted to shape the theater piece at the center of the author's project. because of their vulnerabilities, roma were constantly afraid of negative consequences of the performance, and they never totally trusted the actors. roma advocated for a realistic staging of a tragic female life history with a melodramatic plot line, similar to a soap opera aesthetic. They insisted on including traditional folklore, as well as dance and ritual. the Polish actors (whom kazubowski-houston engaged), on the other hand, looked down on realism and melodramatic conventions, despised the soap opera aesthetic, and advocated for a more abstract avant-garde aesthetic that was foreign to the romani women. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".