MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531297900 · doi:10.18174/570964

Sectorrapportage Duurzame Zuivelketen : Prestaties 2020 in perspectief

2022· report· nl· W2531297900 on OpenAlexaff
G.J. Doornewaard, M.W. Hoogeveen, J.H. Jager, J.W. Reijs, A.C.G. Beldman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasBusinessAgricultural scienceDairy cattleBiodiversitySustainabilityRenewable energyAnimal welfareWelfareGrazingClimate changeNatural resource economicsAgricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceAnimal scienceBiologyEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the Sustainable Dairy Chain initiative, dairy companies and dairy farmers are jointly working on a future-proof and sustainable dairy sector. In 2011, the Sustainable Dairy Chain formulated targets for 2020, relating to climate-neutral development, continuous improvement of animal health and welfare, preservation of grazing, and protection of biodiversity and the environment. This sector report shows to what extent these targets were achieved in 2020. This report also addresses the targets set by the Sustainable Dairy Chain in 2019, for the period up to 2030. Five 2020 target themes were achieved in 2020. These themes are: responsible antibiotics use, energy efficiency, grazing, responsible soy, and dairy cattle phosphate excretion. For four themes, the targets were not achieved. These are: greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia emissions, renewable energy production and dairy cow lifespan. However, progress was made on the latter two themes in 2020. The production of sustainable energy increased for the fourth year in a row and dairy cow lifespan increased for the second year in a row. A monitoring system for animal welfare and biodiversity was created, but no baseline measurements for 2020 have been carried out and no sector targets have been set as of yet. In 2020, the number of dairy cattle and the number of young stock increased by 1.0% and 1.6%, respectively, compared to 2019. This was unfavourable for the outcome of themes like greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207