125 Effect of Postharvest Curing on Respiration and Quality in Garlic Bulbs During Cold Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Garlic ( Allium stivum L. cv. `Seosan') grown in Kyungbuk, Korea were harvested on June 1999 and dried in the field for 2 to 3 days. Bulbs were selected for uniformity in size and maturity and divided into two groups. One group was further dried in the shade at 25 °C for curing before storage at 0 °C. The other group was stored at 0 °C immediately without additional drying. Respiration of garlic bulbs dried additionally for 3 months was low, ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 CO 2 mL/kg per h for 95 days in storage; ethylene was not detected until 60 days in storage. Non-curing samples showed rapid increase of carbon dioxide production after 50 days of storage, this might be related to incidence of fungal decay. Ethylene showed maximum value at 45 days in storage, thereafter remained level of 5.6-6.3 μL/kg per h. All treatments did not show sprouting during storage period, but incidence of decay was significantly reduced by additional drying. The beneficial effect of curing for 3 months at 25 °C was maintenance of low water content in garlic bulbs, which resulted in reduction of decay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".