MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531380746

The Burden of Tobacco-Related Illnesses in China

2015· article· en· W2531380746 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Mateen

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Health: Annual Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaGlobal healthProsperityEpidemiological transitionEconomic growthMillennium Development GoalsDevelopment economicsPopulationEnvironmental healthMalnutritionMedicinePolitical scienceBusinessDeveloping countryHealth careEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The world is now entering an epidemiological transition in which non- communciable diseases (NCDs) are replacing infectious diseases and malnutrition as the leading cause of disability and premature death (1). It is estimated that in the future, almost 70% of all deaths will be due to NCDs and 80% these deaths will occur in low and middle income countries (LMICs) where the majority of the human population lives (1). Thus, the global burden of NCDs represent a significant threat to human health, development, and the achievement and continued maintenance of numerous Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Tackling the global burden of NCDs is a very complicated matter. However, it is estimated that more than half of the global burden of NCDs could be avoided through proper health promotion and prevention initiatives (1). Methodology: This study was conducted as a targeted literature review of articles from: Google Scholar, PubMed, JStor, British Medical Journal, and numerous other databases, using the following key words: tobacco usage in China, burden of tobacco related illnesses in China, China national tobacco corporation, China’s ascension into the WTO, and etc.Findings: The gradual liberalization of China's economy has allowed it to become one of the biggest economies in the world. For continued economic prosperity, it was imperative that China gain membership into World Trade Organization (WTO) so it would be able to actively influence global trade policies, and reduce the notion that it was a global threat. Numerous international industries supported China’s eventual ascension into the WTO, including Transnational Tobacco Corporations (TTCs), which would now have equal access to the 300 million plus Chinese smokers. The Chinese National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC) is a state-owned corporation which happens to be the largest tobacco company in the world. The CNTC generates 7-8% of the Government of China’s annual revenue and has been a crucial factor for the economic prosperity of China (2). However, the medical and labor costs associated with tobacco-related illnesses in China have already started to outweigh the revenue generated by the CNTC. Currently, NCDs account for 80% of all deaths and 70% of total disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in China which can largely be attributed to the high prevalence of tobacco usage, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (3). Conclusions: The future burden of tobacco related diseases in China will continue to rise due to the influx of TTCs, and the continued maintenance of the CNTC to generate revenue for the Government of China. The combination of these factors will worsen China’s burden of tobacco related illnesses which could threaten China’s economic prosperity as the number of deaths associated with tobacco usage is expected to triple by the year 2050 (4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Health: Annual ReviewSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207