The Tumor-promoting Effects of FAM92A1-289 in Cervical Carcinoma Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: FAM92A1-289 is recognized as one of the newly-discovered putative oncogenes. This study was performed to reveal its oncogenic functions in human cervical carcinoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: cell line was established with knock-in technique and selected by puromycin-resistance screening. Scratch assay, methylthiazol tetrazolium assay, colony forming assay and xenograft test were used to examine cell migration, cell proliferation, cell viability and tumor formation, respectively. RESULTS: cells showed higher migration rate (p<0.05), higher cell viability (p<0.01), higher colony formation and tumor growth. The FAM92A1-289 protein was pulled-down by antibodies against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the co-immunoprecipitation assay. CONCLUSION: The up-regulated expression of FAM92A1-289 could facilitate cell migration, boost cell proliferation and promote colony formation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. The interaction between FAM92A1-289 and PCNA was verified by co-immunoprecipitation. This study provided functional evidence for FAM92A1-289 to be developed as a therapeutic target for cancer treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".