The Tumor-promoting Effects of FAM92A1-289 in Cervical Carcinoma Cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: FAM92A1-289 is recognized as one of the newly-discovered putative oncogenes. This study was performed to reveal its oncogenic functions in human cervical carcinoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: cell line was established with knock-in technique and selected by puromycin-resistance screening. Scratch assay, methylthiazol tetrazolium assay, colony forming assay and xenograft test were used to examine cell migration, cell proliferation, cell viability and tumor formation, respectively. RESULTS: cells showed higher migration rate (p<0.05), higher cell viability (p<0.01), higher colony formation and tumor growth. The FAM92A1-289 protein was pulled-down by antibodies against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the co-immunoprecipitation assay. CONCLUSION: The up-regulated expression of FAM92A1-289 could facilitate cell migration, boost cell proliferation and promote colony formation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. The interaction between FAM92A1-289 and PCNA was verified by co-immunoprecipitation. This study provided functional evidence for FAM92A1-289 to be developed as a therapeutic target for cancer treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it