Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPacific Northwest National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsUC Berkeley College of ChemistryClaude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Wake Forest School of MedicineUniversity of California, IrvineNational Nuclear Security AdministrationStony Brook UniversityD. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of RussiaChina National Nuclear CorporationGraduate School, University of MarylandNational University of Science and TechnologyPittsburg State UniversitySichuan UniversitySaint Petersburg State UniversitySan José State UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of IdahoWake Forest UniversityNuclear Power Institute of ChinaUniversity of MissouriUniversity of RochesterCarnegie Mellon UniversityLos Alamos National LaboratoryDomestic Nuclear Detection OfficeUniversity of WashingtonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of CincinnatiWashington University in St. LouisWashington State UniversityOregon State UniversityNovosibirsk State Technical UniversityUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasFlorida State UniversityClemson UniversityUniversity of MichiganCollege of Pharmacy, University of MichiganU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyTexas AgriLife ResearchNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPlutoniumTraining (meteorology)Nuclear engineeringState (computer science)Environmental scienceEngineeringComputer scienceRadiochemistryChemistryPhysicsMeteorology
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis report was created to examine the current state of plutonium training in the United States and to discover ways in which to ensure that the next generation of plutonium workers are fully qualified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.057 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
