MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532239200 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v7n1p146

Emotional problems of Infertile Egyptian women

2016· article· en· W2532239200 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sahar M. Yakout, Mona Talaat, Elham M. Fayad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyInfertilityEmotional distressDepression (economics)PsychologyPsychiatryMarital statusClinical psychologyDisappointmentDistressMedicinePregnancyPsychotherapistPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : Infertility is a very stressful life experience where women may experience emotional distress, threat, depression, anxiety, phobia, disappointment and marital problems. Overall prevalence of emotional problems among infertile couples has been estimated to be around 25%-60%. So the aim of our study was to determine emotional problems among a group of infertile women in Egypt. Methods : A convenient sample of 300 women was recruited for the purpose of this study. The study was implemented at infertility unit and Out–patient gynaecologic section at El-Kasr El-Aini Hospital Cairo university-Egypt. Structured Self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection consists of two parts: Part I which included participants socio-demographic characteristics. Part II: A developed profile of emotional problems was used to assess the emotional problems of the infertile women in terms of anxiety, phobia, obsession, psychosomatic symptoms, depression, and hysterical manifestations.} Results : Revealed that anxiety (83%) was the most significant emotional problems among studied subjects, followed by depression (77%), obsession (72%), psychosomatic disorders (65%), phobia (52%), and hysterical manifestation (2%). The levels of emotional problems had significant associated with subjects' age, level of education, duration of marriage and presence of children. Conclusions : There are high prevalence of emotional problems among infertile women, the study yielded that causes of infertility were mainly related to female factors. Emotional problems of the studied subjects ranked descending; anxiety, depression, obsession, psychosomatic disorders, phobia, and hysterical manifestation. So, it seems that more serious attention is required from nurses, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists for better treatment of these emotional problems. The use of supportive teaching program should be considered as part of the general therapeutic framework of infertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207