MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with cyclophosphamide (C) as 1<sup>st</sup>-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines

2006· article· en· W2532290530 on OpenAlexaff
Ted Vandenberg, M. Trudeau, Louise Provencher, L. Panasci, Louise Yelle, Daniel Rayson, Jean Latreille, M. Clemons, M.F. Giroux, Jean‐François Pouliot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-DameQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiotoxicityMetastatic breast cancerAnthracyclineInternal medicineDoxorubicinCyclophosphamideEpirubicinMucositisGastroenterologyOncologyChemotherapyNeutropeniaAdjuvantRegimenBreast cancerFebrile neutropeniaDiscontinuationCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10627 Background: Anthracyclines (A) are key elements in adjuvant and metastatic chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. Pre-exposure limits the utilization of A in advanced disease due to cumulative cardiotoxicity. PLD (Caelyx/Doxil) has equivalent activity to conventional doxorubicin in MBC. However PLD has reduced toxicity, including significantly less cardiotoxicity. Combinations of A+C are the backbone of many adjuvant therapies, thus C represents a logical drug to combine with PLD. Methods: MBC patients with measurable disease who completed anthracycline containing adjuvant therapy > 12 months ago were entered in a multi-center single arm phase II trial. They received PLD 35mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. This study was powered to demonstrate an objective response rate > 25%. Results: Seventy three patients were enrolled. Prior adjuvant therapy included: AC (37%), CEF/FEC (28%), AC-T (15%), AT (7%), EC (7%). The median cumulative dose of prior A were 240mg/m2 and 580mg/m2 for doxorubicin or epirubicin, respectively. Median time since adjuvant chemotherapy was 4.4 years (1–14). Patients received a median of 6 cycles (2–10) of PLD + C. Major toxicities were; grade 3/4 neutropenia (7.5%), asymptomatic > 10% declines in LVEF (9%) (reversible upon discontinuation of PLD), grade 3/4 hand foot syndrome (6%). Other toxicities were uncommon and usually did not require discontinuation. The objective response rate (ORR) was 38% (4% CR and 34% PR), with an additional 32% having stable disease > 6 months for a clinical benefit of 70% (CB). ORR was similar for patients who had received adjuvant taxanes. Kaplan-Meyer estimated median time to progression was 31.5 weeks (23% progression free). Conclusions: The combination of PLD + C every 3 weeks in patients who have completed adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy after more than one year prior is well tolerated and has a clinical benefit rate of 70%. This finding is similar to other commonly employed chemotherapeutic regimens for MBC and suggests that re-treatment with a non-cardiotoxic anthracycline following previous anthracycline therapy may be a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207