MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532316460 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.562

O3‐10‐02: Mindfulness‐Based Intervention Prevents Memory Decline and Improves Mood and Quality of Life in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Preliminary Findings

2016· article· en· W2532316460 on OpenAlexaff
Eddy Larouche, Anne‐Marie Chouinard, Sonia Goulet, Carol Hudon

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessPsychoeducationGeriatric Depression ScaleQuality of life (healthcare)PsychologyPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialMoodCognitionDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyMeditationMedicinePsychiatryDepressive symptomsPsychotherapistInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last decade, new pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) failed to offer effective, long-lasting solutions, which stimulated the development of prophylactic approaches. Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI) promote the strengthening of attention and a non-reactive attitude through mindfulness meditation and philosophy. Such holistic methods show great potential against pathological aging that could lead to AD. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a MBI in targeting memory decline, depression, and quality of life, compared to an active control condition, in older adults with mild cognitive impairments (MCI). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, older adults with MCI were assigned to a 8-week MBI (n=11) or control (CTRL; n=11) condition, which provided psychoeducation about memory and aging. Pré- and post- intervention, all participants were administered a verbal free-recall memory test, the Geriatric depression scale, and the WHO Quality of life BRIEF and OLD scales. Longitudinal mixed model analyses were conducted to compare the evolution of measurements in both conditions. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated and an intent-to-treat paradigm was used with an alpha of 5%. Participants, of which 36.4% were women, were aged between 56 and 87 (mean=71.6, SD=7.6), with a mean education level of 13.6 years (SD=2.8). Ten participants in each condition completed the study. T-tests or khi-square analyses showed that there was no baseline difference between groups in terms of age (p=0.170), education level (p=0.456), and gender (p=0.225). Compared to the control group, the MBI group showed less objective memory deterioration pré- and post- intervention (MBI=-0,02% p=0.944, CTRL=-3,2% p=0.285; d=0,99), a greater decrease in the number of depressive symptoms (MBI=-3,3% p=0.297, CTRL=-1,6% p=0.634; d=0,43), and increased quality of life (MBI=+1,9% p=0.200, CTRL=+0,0% p=0.756; d=1,57). These preliminary findings indicate that MBI can help preventing memory decline and improving mood and quality of life in older adults with MCI. Moderate and large effect sizes obtained for all variables support the effectiveness of MBI in buffering against pathological aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207