Automated classification of swallowing and breadth sounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to develop an automated and objective method to separate swallowing sounds from breath sounds. Swallowing sound detection can be utilized as part of a system for swallowing mechanism assessment and diagnosis of swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) by acoustical means. In this study, an algorithm based on multilayer feed forward neural networks is proposed for decomposition of tracheal sound into swallowing and respiratory segments. Among many features examined, root-mean-square of the signal, the average power of the signal over 150-450 Hz and waveform fractal dimension were selected features applied to the neural network as inputs. Findings from previous studies about temporal and durational patterns of swallowing and respiration were used in a smart algorithm for further identification of the swallow and breath segments. The proposed method was applied to 18 tracheal sound recordings of 7 healthy subjects (ages 13-30 years, 4 males). The results were validated manually by visual inspection using airflow measurement and spectrogram of the sounds and auditory means. The algorithm was able to detect 91.7% of swallows correctly. The average of missed swallows and average of false detection were 8.3% and 9.5%, respectively. With additional preprocessing and post processing, the proposed method may be used for automated extraction of swallowing sounds from breath sounds in healthy and dysphagic individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".