MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533510031

ADAPTING TO CHANGE: CAN THE REGGIO EMILIA APPROACH HELP WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW QUEBEC CURRICULUM?

2001· article· en· W2533510031 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pauline Mesher, Helen Amoriggi

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCurriculumDocumentationSociologyPedagogyEarly childhood educationPolitical scienceArtComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. Educators in Quebec are faced with implementation of a curriculum reform, which places particular emphasis on young children's learning. One of the most highly regarded approaches to early childhood education is the Reggio Emilia approach, which began in Italy after the Second World War. Documentation of the success of this approach reveals imaginative and creative work produced by three-, four- and five-year-old children. The Reggio Emilia approach has significant similarities to the new Quebec curriculum. These include building on children's previous experiences; allowing children to set goals for themselves and decide on choice of projects; and drawing on a variety of 'languages' to represent children's ideas (e.g. artistic, verbal, or symbolic). In this article, we explore three relevant components of the Reggio Emilia approach which could assist in the implementation of the new Quebec curriculum: 1) the environment, 2) project-based learning, and 3) documentation. AJUSTEMENT AU CHANGEMENT: LA DEMARCHE DE REGGIO EMILIA PEUT-ELLE CONTRIBUER A LA MISE EN OEUVRE DU NOUVEAU CURSUS DU QUEBEC? RESUME. Les educateurs du Quebec sont tenus de mettre en oeuvre une reforme du programme scolaire qui attache plus d'importance a l'apprentissage des jeunes enfants. L'une des methodes d'enseignement prescolaire particulierement prisees est la methode de Reggio Emilia, qui a debute en Italie apres la Deuxieme guerre mondiale. Le succes de cette methode est atteste par des oeuvres imaginatives et creatives concues par des enfants de trois, quatre et cinq ans. Il existe des similitudes entre la methode de Reggio Emilia et le nouveau programme du Quebec. Entre autres, les deux s'inspirent des experiences prealables des enfants; elles permettent aux enfants de se fixer des objectifs pour eux-memes et de decider des projets qu'ils entendent realiser; et elles s'inspirent d'une diversite de «langages» pour representer les idees des enfants (par ex. le langage artistique, verbal ou symbolique). Dans cet article, nous etudions trois composantes de la methode de Reggio Emilia susceptibles d'aider a la mise en oeuvre du nouveau cursus du Quebec: 1) l'environnement; 2) l'apprentissage axe sur des projets; et 3) la documentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207