MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533513806 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2008.4774488

LabPET II, a novel 64-channel APD-based PET detector module with individual pixel readout achieving submillimetric spatial resolution

2008· article· en· W2533513806 on OpenAlexaff
P. Bérard, Mélanie Bergeron, C. Pépin, J. Cadorette, Marc‐André Tétrault, Nicolas Viscogliosi, Réjean Fontaine, H. Dautet, Murray Davies, P. Deschamps, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvalanche photodiodePhysicsPreamplifierLyso-PixelDark currentDetectorImage resolutionAPDSNoise (video)Application-specific integrated circuitSilicon photomultiplierScintillatorOptoelectronicsOpticsComputer scienceComputer hardwareCMOSAmplifierArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new avalanche photodiode (APD) detector module, the LabPET II, was developed to achieve submillimetre spatial resolution for small animal molecular imaging. The module consists of two monolithic APD arrays of 4 × 8 pixels, each with an active area of 1.1 × 1.1 mm2at a 1.2 mm pitch. The two APD arrays are mounted in a custom ceramic holder and coupled to an 8 × 8 LYSO scintillator array designed to accommodate one-to-one coupling between individual APDs and crystal pixels. An analog test board adapted from the LabPET™ processing electronics and consisting of four 16-channel preamplifier ASICs, was designed for testing the LabPET II detector module. The devices have a broad operating range (over 200 V) with breakdown voltage of ∼350 V, at which a typical gain well above 200 is reached. Individual APD pixels have a capacitance of 3.7 ± 0.4 pF (including stray capacitance), a typical dark current of 30 ± 11 nA, a dark noise of 0.13 ± 0.03 pA/Hz½and an equivalent noise charge (ENC) of 12 e−rms at a gain of 100. At a standard APD operating bias, a mean energy resolution of 27.5 ± 2.1% was typically obtained with a relative standard deviation of 13.8% in signal amplitude for the 64 individual pixels when irradiated with 511 keV photons. A global timing resolution of 5.0 ± 0.2 ns FWHM was measured with two modules in coincidence. Finally, an intrinsic spatial resolution of 0.82 ± 0.02 mm FWHM (1.54 ± 0.05 mm FWTM) was obtained by sweeping a22Na point source between two rows of the detector array. By deconvolving the source size and non-collinearity, an expected 0.73 mm intrinsic geometric crystal resolution is obtained. The LabPET II detector module is demonstrating promising characteristics for dedicated small animal PET imaging at submillimetre resolution and, with some further optimization, would be suitable as the building block for a dual-modality combined PET/CT system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207