MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533604904 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.081

IC‐P‐051: Radiological‐Pathological Correlation in Alzheimer's Disease: Pre‐Mortem Mri Narrative Review

2016· article· en· W2533604904 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Dallaire‐Théroux, Simon Duchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathologyAtrophyHippocampal sclerosisPathologyMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCerebral amyloid angiopathyAutopsyNeuroimagingPathologicalDementiaAlzheimer's diseaseSenile plaquesDiseaseRadiologyTemporal lobePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to promote an early diagnosis, we wished to examine the relationship between detected changes on antemortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by conducting a narrative review of published radiological-pathological correlation studies. We explored the PubMed database in June-July 2015 for published articles with any of the following terms: “Alzheimer's disease”, “antemortem MRI”, “autopsy”, “neuropathology”, “pathology MRI correlation”, “postmortem histopathology”, “quantitative MRI”, “structural neuroimaging”, and “volumetric MRI”. This initial search resulted in 301 articles dated 1988 to 2014. We (C.D.-T.) screened articles for inclusion first by examining the title and abstract, then the full text version. Overall, 286 articles were deemed as not appropriate to fulfill our research aim. A second author (S.D.) reviewed the 15 remaining articles to confirm their relevance, to which were added nine other published work based on their reference list. In fine, we report results based on 24 different manuscripts. As expected, in addition to normal-aging brain atrophy, accumulation of the key neuropathological features of AD, neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques, are associated with whole-brain atrophy, hippocampal atrophy and particularly with ventricular expansion detected by volumetric MRI. Studies show further that vascular lesions such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cortical microinfarcts also add to the loss of brain volume seen in AD. Hippocampal atrophy is also related to hippocampal sclerosis, a lesion occasionally found with AD-related pathology. However, MRI volume loss correlates more with tangles than all other pathological findings. Finally, MRI-detected white matter hyperintensities are strongly associated with vascular pathologies such as arteriosclerosis and micro- or large infarcts, but can also represent other histological changes such as gliosis or demyelination. Anatomic alterations such as cerebral volume loss and white matter changes in the pre-mortem brain have been shown to be reflective of underlying neuropathology as seen at autopsy. It has been proven in different studies that these changes are detectable using antemortem MRI. Adequate pathological staging of AD is therefore possible using this in vivo technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207