MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533803691 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1608

P2‐397: Making an Exit: Personhood Perspectives on the Drive for a Cure

2016· article· en· W2533803691 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Whitehouse, Elinor Fuchs

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonhoodPostmodernismMemoirNarrativeSociologyPsychologyDementiaAestheticsMeaning (existential)PsychoanalysisDramaMedicalizationEpistemologyPsychotherapistMedicineLiteratureDiseasePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease is a modern concept associated with the emergence of scientific approaches to studying the brain. It affects not only individuals but the entire fabric of interpersonal relationships. Today the Alzheimer’s field epitomizes modern biomedical orientations which focus on precise diagnostic labeling, objective data, and claims that effective pharmaceutical treatments are within reach. Narratives of care partnerships that place individuals in networks of relationship are important antidotes to this dominant, essentially individualistic, scientific focus. Such partnerships in dementia care can succeed by adopting the postmodern attributes of play and disruption and “staying in the moment.” Play is a way to avoid over-medicalization. This paper will challenge the mainstream scientific approach to late life dementia by relying both on the critical work of Peter Whitehouse, and on two books by Yale Drama School professor Elinor Fuchs, her Alzheimer’s memoir Making an Exit, and her award-winning study of postmodern theater, The Death of Character. Their two voices, including the voice of Fuchs’s late mother Lil, have engaged in a playful, yet seriously intended, alternation as a way of modeling a loving but non-rationalistic partnering approach to dementia. Caregiving can and should be a deeply nuanced and potentially positive experience. Topics like the meaning of ‘personhood,’ the importance of the dyad in relationship, the spiritual value of caregiving to the dementia caregiver, and the possibility of personal growth even in one who has lost the capacity for sequential language and thought, emerge in Fuchs’s memoir and in this presentation. The exploration of caring relationships in the context of dementia can deepen our understanding of aging, cognitive and brain health, and the meaning of personhood. Such efforts illuminate different ways, which can perhaps be classified as modern and postmodern, to address age related cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.055
Scholarly communication0.0100.016
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207