MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533991363 · doi:10.1016/s1569-9056(16)30192-0

Transobturator Tape (TOT) for stress urinary incontinence - a reliable and safe primary intervention or after failed physiotherapy/kinesitherapy

2016· article· en· W2533991363 on OpenAlex
Valeri Mariyanovski, B. Mladenov, K. Kazalakova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Supplements · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinary incontinenceVisual analogue scaleDistressPhysical therapyConcomitantPatient satisfactionOutpatient clinicStress incontinenceSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To report the subjective and objective outcomes and patient satisfaction with the outside-in transobturator tape (TOT) procedure during long-term follow-up.Clinical follow-up study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).University hospital.One hundred ninety-one women who underwent the TOT procedure. Of these, 66% had stress urinary incontinence and 34% had mixed urinary incontinence, and 45% underwent concomitant surgery.Patients underwent surgery between May 2003 and December 2004 using the TOT procedure. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, postal questionnaires and an invitation for a follow-up visit to the outpatient clinic were sent to the patients. Objective cure was defined as a negative result of a stress test and no repeat operation because of stress urinary incontinence during follow-up. Subjective outcome was evaluated using the following validated questionnaires: UISS (Urinary Incontinence Severity Score), DIS (Detrussor Instability Score), VAS (visual analog scale, 0–100), short versions of the IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7) and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory-6), and the EQ-5D and EQ-5D VAS. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a self-tailored questionnaire.Of 191 patients, 139 (73%) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. Objective and subjective cure rates were 89% and 83%, respectively. Of the patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence, 92% were completely or quite satisfied with the surgery, and 76% of the patients with mixed urinary incontinence were satisfied (p < .001). Patients with body mass index >30 had significantly higher scores on the IIQ-7, UDI-6 (p < .01 for both), VAS (p < .001), UISS (p < .01), and DIS (p < .001), thus indicating a less favorable outcome of the procedure.A high objective cure rate persisted after a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. Caution is advised when the TOT procedure is planned in patients with mixed urinary incontinence or severe obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it