Transobturator Tape (TOT) for stress urinary incontinence - a reliable and safe primary intervention or after failed physiotherapy/kinesitherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To report the subjective and objective outcomes and patient satisfaction with the outside-in transobturator tape (TOT) procedure during long-term follow-up.Clinical follow-up study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).University hospital.One hundred ninety-one women who underwent the TOT procedure. Of these, 66% had stress urinary incontinence and 34% had mixed urinary incontinence, and 45% underwent concomitant surgery.Patients underwent surgery between May 2003 and December 2004 using the TOT procedure. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, postal questionnaires and an invitation for a follow-up visit to the outpatient clinic were sent to the patients. Objective cure was defined as a negative result of a stress test and no repeat operation because of stress urinary incontinence during follow-up. Subjective outcome was evaluated using the following validated questionnaires: UISS (Urinary Incontinence Severity Score), DIS (Detrussor Instability Score), VAS (visual analog scale, 0–100), short versions of the IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7) and UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory-6), and the EQ-5D and EQ-5D VAS. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a self-tailored questionnaire.Of 191 patients, 139 (73%) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. Objective and subjective cure rates were 89% and 83%, respectively. Of the patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence, 92% were completely or quite satisfied with the surgery, and 76% of the patients with mixed urinary incontinence were satisfied (p < .001). Patients with body mass index >30 had significantly higher scores on the IIQ-7, UDI-6 (p < .01 for both), VAS (p < .001), UISS (p < .01), and DIS (p < .001), thus indicating a less favorable outcome of the procedure.A high objective cure rate persisted after a mean follow-up of 6.5 years. Caution is advised when the TOT procedure is planned in patients with mixed urinary incontinence or severe obesity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".