MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2534139907 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1683

P3‐026: Trial of S‐Equol in Alzheimer’s Disease (SEAD)

2016· article· en· W2534139907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Wilkins, Paul Welch, Scott J. Koppel, Rebecca Bothwell, Jonathan D. Mahnken, Jeffrey M. Burns, Russell H. Swerdlow

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboMitochondrial biogenesisInternal medicineEndocrinologyMitochondrionPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been observed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Specifically, cytochrome oxidase (COX, a mitochondrial electron transport chain enzyme) activity is reduced in both brain and platelet mitochondria from AD patients. S-equol is an estrogen receptor beta (ER-beta) agonist. ERbeta are localized within mitochondria, and activation stimulates mitochondrial function and mitochondrial biogenesis. Based on these observations we hypothesized S-equol may benefit AD subjects. 15 female AD participants (CDR 0.5 or 1) were enrolled into this 6-week, single-blind trial. The trial was designed to assess the primary outcome of platelet COX activity at baseline, in response to S-equol, and after a washout period. Participants were treated with twice a day placebo for two weeks, followed by 10mg twice a day S-equol for two weeks followed by a 2 week washout period. Phlebotomy, vitals, safety assessments, and a brief cognitive assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment exam (MoCA)) were completed at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks. 15 participants were enrolled and 14 have completed the study. One subject dropped out prior to initiating the study due to non-study related reasons. In order to be considered a “responder” (i.e. increasing COX activity in response to treatment) the individual change (slope) between visits 2 and 3 had to be greater than the change (slope) between visits 3 and 4. When normalized to citrate synthase (CS) activity and protein concentration, 10 of the participants were considered responders, while 4 were considered non-responders. Of the 4 non-responders, one subject did show an increase in COX activity (normalized to protein and CS), but the visit 3 to 4 slope was greater than the visit 2 to 3 slope. S-equol was well-tolerated by and appeared safe in these AD participants. The study currently plans to enroll at least one additional subject, and upon completion of the study all endpoints will be analyzed. Our data suggest S-equol may increase platelet COX activity, warranting further testing in AD participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities→French-language works237,207→