N-Terminal Pro–B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Immunoreactivity Is Reduced After 6 Years of Storage at −70 °C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial samples may be stored frozen for prolonged periods before analysis, which can reduce the immunoreactivity of numerous analytes, particularly peptides. We sought to determine the effect of 6 years of frozen storage on serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHODS: NT-proBNP was measured from serum samples taken from 99 different patients enrolled in the CanPREDDICT study after <1 year of storage at -70 °C using the Roche first-generation NT-proBNP assay on an e411 instrument. Separate aliquots of the same samples were analyzed after an additional 6 years of storage at -70 °C using the Roche second-generation assay on an e601 instrument. RESULTS: The median NT-proBNP immunoreactivity for the first measurement was 572 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 205-1606, range 49-12820), while after an additional 6 years of storage at -70 °C, this value decreased to 526 pg/mL (IQR 181-1338, range 18-12880), resulting in a median percent difference of -7% (IQR -10.6% to -3.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report findings consistent with trends seen in previous work but have investigated the effect of a much longer storage period. Larger percent decreases in NT-proBNP reaching statistical significance are seen, although the median difference is still <10%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".