P2‐164: Pulse Pressure and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Risk of Alzheimer's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential clinical value of the widening of pulse pressure (PP) as a Alzheimer disease (AD) risk factor. The study included a total of 119 participants. The study logistics complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. PP as defined as the difference between the systolic and diastolic pressure readings and the risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's Disease was evaluate with The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a test for detection of MCI. Bivariate analyses with Non parametric measures (Spearman).The SPSS for Windows (version 16.0) was used for statistical analyses. All p values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. The general characteristics of the study was 119 participants, 74 women and 45 men; mean age of 72.8 ± 8.2 years, 82 participants with MCI risk . We conducted bivariate analyses PP was not significantly associated with MCI risk (ρ: -0,89 p<0.016). PP is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and as a measure of early vascular aging but it is unknown the relationship with risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease. This study shows a negative relationship between pulse and MCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".