An Ambulatory Clinical Teaching Unit: Filling the Outpatient Gap in Internal Medicine Residency Training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of time in a core General Internal Medicine (GIM) residency is spent focusing on inpatient medicine, with relatively little time devoted to ambulatory medicine. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada has mandated an improvement in ambulatory exposure. Unfortunately, most ambulatory experiences tend to lack formal structure, a dedicated educational curriculum, and graduated learner-specific responsibilities. The recent Royal College recognition of GIM as a subspecialty places renewed emphasis on core IM training providing a more comprehensive exposure to outpatient medicine as management of patients with multiple complex conditions may be best managed by a general internist. In July 2015, McMaster University opened an outpatient medicine clinic which is designed to be an Ambulatory Clinical Teaching Unit (A-CTU). The A-CTU provides a structured clinical environment which is focused on the management of medically-complex patients. It uses a multidisciplinary model, graded learner levels of responsibility and a dedicated educational curriculum. The unique structure of the A-CTU allows for the assessment of milestones and EP As (entrustable professional activities) pertaining to consultation skills and chronic disease management, in keeping with competence by design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".