MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535352087 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1614

P2‐402: Social Recreation: an Innovative Approach

2016· article· en· W2535352087 on OpenAlexaff
Katie Berkelmans, Susan Oster

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsAlzheimer Society London Middlesex
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespite careRecreationSocializationPsychologyCurriculumGerontologyQuality of life (healthcare)Variety (cybernetics)Medical educationApplied psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePedagogyNursingComputer sciencePolitical sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2010 the Alzheimer Society of London and Middlesex (ASLM) acknowledged a gap in services for those living in the early to middle stages of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias (ADOD). There was a need for programs which provide social, emotional, cognitive and physical stimulation in shorter time spans than a full day at a day program. Research suggests recreational programming may improve one’s quality of life by maintaining functional ability and independence while slowing down the progression of the disease. In 2010 ASLM began to offer a variety of social recreation programs to our clients in the early to middle stages of ADOD. ASLM’s programs include cooking, exercise, knitting, scrapbooking, art, gardening and music. The curriculum for the program activities build on strengths, positive emotion, meaningful moments, enjoyment, challenges and development. The clients are paired 1:1 with volunteers providing socialization and engagement on the task. In the last five years the social recreation programs have grown fivefold. ASLM started with just one cooking program and has expanded to eight different programs extending our services throughout the London and Middlesex County. For caregivers, the respite time has lowered levels of stress and burden. For the clients, the programs have been a safe place to connect with others going through the same experiences while improving skills in all domains and providing a sense of accomplishment. This has been a good starting point and “First Link” in the early stages of the disease for both the client and the family to get connected with the Alzheimer Society earlier for ongoing support such as education and counselling. Physicians have increasingly been “prescribing” physical, mental and social leisure activities as viable treatment options for ADOD. Recreation improves persons with dementia quality of life by providing an enjoyable atmosphere to develop and maintain important skills. ASLM’s programs provide people living with ADOD experience participating in recreational programs in the early to mid-stages of their disease. The transition to full-day programming, which is brought on by the progression of their illness, may be smoother for people who have participated in these programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207