Effect of general anesthesia on serum β-amyloid protein and regional cerebral oxygen saturation of elderly patients after subtotal gastrectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of general anesthesia on serum β-amyloid protein (Aβ) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) of elderly patients after subtotal gastrectomy. From June, 2014 to December, 2015, among 168 patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy, the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment was administered the day prior to surgery and the second and ninth days after the operation. In addition, we administered the tests to 168 healthy adult volunteers (healthy controls) who were treated in our hospital medical center in the same period. Near-infrared spectroscopy technology was used for continuous monitoring of the intraoperative rSO2, and the mean of intraoperative rSO2 was then calculated. Of the 168 patients, 28 developed postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and the remaining 140 patients were normal (control). The ELISA method was used to test the expression levels of serum Aβ in the three groups and statistical analyses were conducted. Serum Aβ level in the POCD group was significantly higher than that in the control and healthy control groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The rSO2 level in the patients with POCD was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). The correlation analysis with Aβ as an independent variable and other factors as dependent variables revealed that the serum Aβ level negatively correlated with rSO2 (r=-1.6749, P<0.05). The combined Aβ and rSO2 may be useful for the diagnosis and prevention of POCD after subtotal gastrectomy under general anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".