MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535582297 · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00403

Multicomponent Hetero-[4 + 2] Cycloaddition/Allylboration Reaction: From Natural Product Synthesis to Drug Discovery

2016· article· en· W2535582297 on OpenAlexafffund
Dennis G. Hall, Taras Rybak, Tristan Verdelet

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Cancer Board
KeywordsCycloadditionChemistryPiperidineAllylic rearrangementNatural productCombinatorial chemistryTandemPyranDrug discoveryAtom economyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicomponent reactions (MCR), transformations employing three or more simple substrates in a single and highly atom-economical operation, are very attractive in both natural product synthesis and diversity-oriented synthesis of druglike molecules. Several popular multicomponent reactions were designed by combining two well-established individual reactions that utilize mutually compatible substrates. In this regard, it is not surprising that the merging of two reactions deemed as workhorses of stereoselective synthesis, the Diels-Alder cycloaddition and carbonyl allylboration, would produce a powerful and highly versatile tandem MCR process. The idea of using 1,3-dienylboronates in [4 + 2] cycloadditions as a means to produce cyclic allylic boronates was first reported by Vaultier and Hoffmann in 1987. In their seminal study, a 1-boronodiene was reacted with electron-poor alkenes, and the intermediate cycloadducts were isolated and added to aldehydes in a separate step leading to α-hydroxyalkylated carbocycles via a highly diastereoselective allylboration reaction. The one-pot three-component variant was realized in 1999 by Lallemand and co-workers, and soon after groups led by Hall and Carboni reported heterocyclic variants of the tandem [4 + 2] cycloaddition/allylboration to prepare α-hydroxyalkylated piperidine and pyran containing compounds, respectively. These classes of heterocycles are ubiquitous in Nature and are important components of pharmaceuticals. This Account summarizes the development and evolution of this powerful multicomponent reaction for accessing nonaromatic heterocycles and its many applications in natural products synthesis and drug discovery. The aza[4 + 2]cycloaddition/allylboration MCR was first optimized in our laboratory using 4-boronylhydrazonobutadienes and N-substituted maleimides, and it was exploited in the preparation of combinatorial libraries of polysubstituted imidopiperidines that feature as many as four elements of chemical diversity. Biological screening of these druglike imidopiperidine libraries unveiled promising bioactive agents such as A12B4C3, the first reported inhibitor of the human DNA repair enzyme, polynucleotide kinase-phosphatase (hPNKP). Related applications of this MCR in target-oriented synthesis also led to total syntheses of palustrine alkaloids. The inverse electron-demand oxa[4 + 2] cycloaddition/allyboration variant can take advantage of Jacobsen's chiral Cr(III)salen catalyst, affording a rare example of catalytic enantioselective MCR, one that provides a rapid access to α-hydroxyalkyl dihydropyrans in high enantio- and diastereoselectivity. This process exploits 3-boronoacrolein pinacolate as the heterodiene with ethyl vinyl ether or various 2-substituted enol ethers, along with a wide variety of aldehydes in the allylation stage. This versatile methodology was deployed in total syntheses of thiomarinol antibiotics, goniodiol and its derivatives, and the complex anticancer macrolide palmerolide A. More recent work from our laboratory centered on the regio- and stereoselective Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of the dihydropyranyl boronates, thus providing a glimpse of the potential for new multicomponent variants that merge hetero[4 + 2] cycloadditions of 1-borylated heterodienes with transition metal-catalyzed transformations. This stereoselective MCR strategy holds great promise for provoking continuing applications in complex molecule synthesis and drug discovery, and is likely to inspire new and innovative MCR-based approaches to nonaromatic heterocycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations131
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207