MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2535849251 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.470

O2‐13‐05: CSF Markers of Inflammation and Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis in the Cognitively Intact Prevent‐Ad Cohort

2016· article· en· W2535849251 on OpenAlexaff
John C.S. Breitner, Judes Poirier, Terrence Town, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier, Tara M. Weitz

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathogenesisBiomarkerInternal medicineCohortDementiaOncologyPlaceboDiseaseCerebrospinal fluidImmunologyGastroenterologyPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decades-long pre-symptomatic stages of AD offer a window of opportunity for evaluation of candidate interventions that may slow disease progression and defer onset of symptoms. Among such potential interventions are anti-inflammatory treatments. We therefore investigated the relationship of 45 inflammatory markers in CSF with a common metric for AD pathogenesis. We recruited >350 cognitively intact persons aged 60+ with a parental history of AD-like dementia (confers ∼3-fold increased risk of AD). From this “PREVENT-AD” cohort, we enrolled 210 into INTREPAD, a two-year placebo-controlled cognitive- and biomarker-endpoint trial of naproxen-sodium 220mg b.i.d. as a potential AD preventive. Among these, 107 participants agreed to serial lumbar punctures at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. In pilot work with 20 CSF samples, we assayed baseline CSF for 45 inflammatory markers using both the Luminex “Milliplex” and MesoScale Discovery (MSD) platforms. Using Innotest ELISA kits, we assayed the same CSF samples for Aβ42, total-tau (t-tau) and P-tau. The Luminex and MSD assays produced generally consistent results for 21 overlapping inflammatory markers (Figure 1C shows results for IP-10), although ceiling effects may limit MSD for some markers (Figure 1D). We analyzed the association of these and other markers with the ratio of CSF total-tau (t-tau) to Aβ42, a widely used index of disease progression. Even in this limited sample, we observed significant correlation (p <0.05) between IL-1β, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, or TNF-α (all measurable using both platforms) and log t-tau/Aβ42 (e.g., Figure 1A, 1B). MCP-4 and TARC were also correlated with log t-tau/Aβ42, but were measurable by MSD only. Changes in markers of AD progression may be used in high-risk populations to assess potential of candidate preventive interventions. The importance of inflammatory processes in AD pathogenesis is suggested by a strong association between several inflammatory markers and an established index of AD progression. Our results suggest a rationale for testing anti-inflammatory treatments as potential preventives that may delay onset of AD symptoms – now under investigation in INTREPAD. The longitudinal pattern of individual inflammatory markers and their response to NSAID treatment may reveal much about the etio-pathogenesis of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→