MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2536027390 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.242

TD‐O4‐01: The Personal and Societal Impact of the Dementia Ambient Care (Dem@care) Multi‐Sensor Remote‐Monitoring Dementia Care System

2016· article· en· W2536027390 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Hopper, Αναστάσιος Καρακώστας, Alexandra König, Stefan Sävenstedt, Ioannis Kompatsiaris

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMoodActivities of daily livingMedical diagnosisCognitionWearable computerPsychologyMedicinePsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relation of behavioural and cognitive monitoring parameters to dementia-specific patterns can provide a promising and objective approach to dementia assessment given the long-term nature of the measurements. Furthermore, technologies that monitor daily living can enable a person with dementia to remain independent for longer by supporting their health, well-being and safety, while reducing the burden on family/friends and decreasing healthcare costs. The EU FP7-funded research project “Dementia Ambient Care” (Dem@Care), developed an integrated solution for the remote monitoring, diagnosis and support of people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. It investigated the use of multiple wearable (accelerometers, 2D/3D cameras, microphones) and ambient sensors (visual and infrared cameras, sleep sensors) for the recording of daily activities, lifestyle patterns, emotions, and speech, as well as the use of intelligent mechanisms for the assessment of an individual’s condition at diagnosis, and over time in multiple care settings. Feedback was provided to clinicians, and directly to people with dementia and their caregivers. Dem@Care had a positive impact for people with dementia regarding increased independence. They reported a sense of improvement in their subjective quality of life and in the five key domains addressed by the solution; sleep, physical activity, social interaction, activities of daily living and mood. Improvements for the person with dementia translated into improvements for their informal caregivers and in some cases increased independence (related to dementia severity). Clinicians and formal care staff benefited from improved assessment and diagnostic procedures, enhanced ability to make differential diagnoses, and more timely identification of functional, behavioural, and emotional pattern changes. Although difficult to evaluate the longer-term economic and societal outcomes, we suggest that successful attainment of stakeholder’s personal outcomes will, over time, lead to a reduction in healthcare costs and less social isolation for those living with dementia. Dem@Care is shown to have contributed to the advancement of the technical, clinical, and ethical management of dementia care through the innovative use of ICT solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→