MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536403148 · doi:10.1109/aprasc.2004.1422468

Astrometric VLBI observation of spacecraft with phase delay

2005· article· en· W2536403148 on OpenAlexaff
Mamoru Sekido, Ryuichi Ichikawa, Hiro Osaki, Tetsuro Kondo, Yasuhiro Koyama, Makoto Yoshikawa, T. Ohnishi, W. H. Cannon, А. Н. Новиков, Mario Bérubé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-long-baseline interferometrySpacecraftGeodesyPhysicsOrbit determinationOrbit (dynamics)Phase (matter)Group delay and phase delayRemote sensingComputer scienceAstronomyAerospace engineeringGeologySatelliteEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of VLBI observations for the NOZOMI spacecraft was performed between the end of 2002 and July 2003 with aim of supporting orbit determination. We have made an astrometric analysis of the VLBI data for celestial coordinates estimation of the spacecraft with phase delay observables. Phase delay has the potential to give 3-4 orders of improvement in delay resolution over group delay measurement, whereas the main difficulty in using phase delay is the ambiguity problem. We observed the NOZOMI spacecraft continuously for a long time with multiple VLBI stations, and we avoided the problem of phase ambiguity by connecting the phase delay. For correlation processing and analysis of VLBI data, a relativistic VLBI delay model for a finite distance radio source was developed, and it was used for the analysis. The coordinates of the spacecraft in the celestial sphere were estimated by a least-squares parameter fitting technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207