MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2536555786 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1633

P2‐421: Indicators of Cognitive Reserve Moderate the Adverse Relationship Between Poor Diet Quality and Cognitive Decline in Independent Older Adults: The Nuage Study

2016· article· en· W2536555786 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew D. Parrott, Alexandra Fiocco, Pierre‐Hugues Carmichael, Nicole D. Anderson, Danielle Laurin, Carol E. Greenwood, Guylaine Ferland, Bryna Shatenstein, Pierrette Gaudreau, Hélène Payette, Sylvie Belleville, José A. Morais, Marie‐Jeanne Kergoat

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversité LavalMcGill University Health CentreQuebec Network for Research on AgingToronto Metropolitan UniversityBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionGerontologyCognitive declineCognitive testEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceDemographyLogistic regressionMedicinePsychologyWestern dietEnvironmental healthObesityInternal medicinePsychiatryDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although diet quality and indicators of cognitive reserve (CR) have been associated with cognitive function in separate studies, there is little understanding of how the combination of these factors may influence cognitive function. A mentally stimulating environment has been shown to abolish the adverse impact of poor diet quality on memory in laboratory animals. Therefore, our primary objective was to determine whether the relationship between diet quality and cognitive function was dependent on an individual’s level of CR in community-dwelling older adults. Poor diet quality was defined at baseline as adherence to a ‘Western’ dietary pattern identified by principal component analysis of food frequency questionnaire responses from 351 independently living older adults followed over 3 years. CR was defined as a binary composite score which considered an individual’s educational attainment, occupational complexity, and social engagement. Statistical interactions between diet quality and CR were specified in multiple-adjusted mixed models to test possible interdependent effects on cognitive function (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination; 3MS). Adherence to the Western pattern was characterized by consumption of red and processed meats, white bread, potatoes, pre-packaged foods and sweets. In basic models, high adherence to the Western pattern was associated with accelerated cognitive decline (P=0.011) after adjusting for sex, age, physical activity, smoking, and CR. Possible dependency between CR and diet quality was indicated by a marginally significant interaction (P=0.073). After stratification it was found that the adverse relationship between Western pattern adherence and cognitive decline was present in individuals with low CR (P=0.003; n=182), but was absent in individuals in the upper category of CR (P=0.546; n=169). We found that the adverse relationship between poor diet quality and cognitive decline was restricted to individuals with low indications of CR. A similarly poor diet was not associated with cognitive decline in those with high indications of CR. These results suggest that educated older adults with a history of mentally stimulating work and who remain socially engaged may be spared from the adverse effect of a Western diet on age-related cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→