MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Results of the Mantle Cell Lymphoma Subset from a Phase 2a Study of Copanlisib, a Novel PI3K Inhibitor, in Patients with Indolent and Aggressive Lymphoma

2015· article· en· W2537189179 on OpenAlexaff
David Cunningham, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Sarit Assouline, Krimo Bouabdallah, Dominique Bron, Corinne Haïoun, Luigina Mollica, Marius Giurescu, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Marta M. Lemos, Julia Grunert, Florian Hiemeyer, Barrett H. Childs, Martin Dreyling

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantle cell lymphomaMedicineInternal medicineIdelalisibLymphomaPhases of clinical researchChronic lymphocytic leukemiaOncologyProgressive diseaseAggressive lymphomaClinical endpointGastroenterologyClinical trialIbrutinibRituximabLeukemiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive disease that is incurable with conventional therapy and the outcome of which remains the poorest amongst B-cell lymphomas. Phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway activation contributes to MCL pathogenesis, but early-phase studies of the PI3K-δ selective inhibitor idelalisib have reported lower responses in MCL compared with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes (Kahl et al., Blood 123:3398-405, 2014; Gopal et al., NEJM 370:1008-18, 2014). In addition, although PI3K-δ is highly expressed in MCL, PI3K-α shows wide variation and expression increases with relapse (Iyengar et al., Blood 121;2274-84, 2013). Copanlisib is a novel pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor with potent preclinical inhibitory activity against both PI3K-α and PI3K-δ isoforms. Preliminary results from a phase 2a study of copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been reported (Dreyling et al., ASH 2013), with an expansion cohort in patients with aggressive lymphoma ongoing. We report here the final results of the MCL subset. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed indolent and aggressive NHL and relapsed after, or refractory to, ≥2 prior lines of treatment were eligible. Copanlisib was administered at the starting dose of 0.8 mg/kg as a 1 hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed per independent radiologic review according to the response criteria for lymphoma (Cheson et al., JCO 17:1244, 1999). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR), safety and tolerability. Results: As of February 28, 2015, of the 81 patients enrolled, a total of 11 patients with MCL were treated. Median age was 70 years (range 60-85), M/F= 8/3. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 3 (range 3-9) with a median time of 1.4 months since last systemic anti-cancer therapy. All patients previously received rituximab and 8 patients (73%) were refractory to the last therapy. The median duration of treatment was 17 weeks (range 3-59), corresponding to a median number of 4 cycles (range 1-15), with a close adherence to planned dose (median 92%). The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) of all grades were hyperglycemia (8 patients, 73%), hypertension (6 patients, 55%), neutropenia (5 patients, 46%) and fatigue (4 patients, 36%). Grade 3-4 AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included: neutropenia (2 patients with grade 3, 18%; 3 patients with grade 4, 27%), hypertension (3 patients with grade 3, 27%), hyperglycemia (2 patients with grade 3, 18%), and fatigue (2 patients with grade 3, 18%). One grade 5 AE of acute respiratory failure, was assessed as drug-related by the investigator. Dose reductions and delays possibly due to study drug-related adverse events (AE) were reported in 2 (18%) and 6 (55%) patients, respectively. Two patients were discontinued from study treatment due to adverse events (lung infection and non-melanoma skin cancer). All 11 patients were included into efficacy assessment, although one clinical PD was not confirmed by radiologic measurement. The ORR as determined by independent radiologic review was 64% (2 CRu and 5 PRs). The median duration of response was 150 days (95% CI: 56, 434); 33% of responders had a DOR of at least 270 days. PFS ranged from 7 to 547 days [median 112 days (95% CI: 42, 377)]. Conclusions: Copanlisib was active as a single-agent, with an ORR of 64%, and had a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced refractory/relapsed MCL. These results support the potential role of inhibiting both PI3k-α and PI3K-δ in relapsed MCL. Based on these results, a phase 2 trial of copanlisib in ibrutinib-pretreated patients with MCL is under way (NCT02455297). Disclosures Cunningham: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Merrimack: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck Serono: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Zinzani:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Mollica:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Giurescu:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Gorbatchevsky:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Neves:Bayer HealthCare: Employment. Lemos:Bayer HealthCare: Employment. Grunert:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Hiemeyer:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Childs:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207