MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2537237736 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.112

IC‐P‐083: MRI Patch‐Based Imaging Biomarker for Automatic Detection of Parkinson Disease

2016· article· en· W2537237736 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Fonov, Mahsa Dadar, Yiming Xiao, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubthalamic nucleusParkinson's diseaseSubstantia nigraReceiver operating characteristicDopaminergicBasal gangliaMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingBiomarkerDiseaseNuclear medicineNeurosciencePathologyInternal medicinePsychologyDopamineDeep brain stimulationRadiologyBiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder affecting the motor system due to loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra in addition to non-dopaminergic system degeneration mainly in the basal ganglia region. Finding sensitive biomarkers of PD would facilitate the clinical management, particularly in the early stages of disease. Sensitive biomarkers could also effectively help advance drug development for the condition. Recently, we have developed a method for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease based on the automatic analysis of T1w MRI scans. Here we adapt this method for detection of PD. The method is based on nonlocal patch-based algorithm, estimating anatomical patterns from a given subject in a specific brain region and comparing them with a database composed of healthy subjects and patients. The output of the method is a grading value showing similarity towards NC (-1) or PD (+1).We tested the method using the baseline 3T high resolution T1-weighted MRI scans obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/data), corresponding to newly diagnosed PD patients (n=198) and an age-matched control group (n=93). We performed 10-fold cross-validation experiments and measured grading values for the substantia nigra (SN) and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The classifier performance was tested by estimating the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC). Our results showed statistically significant differences in grading values for left SN (p=0.013) and left STN (p=0.0002) between patients and controls. When used to classify individual subjects in the cross-validation experiment the performance of the classifier yields an AUC=0.662 for the left SN, and AUC=0.733 for the left STN. We have shown that our method could be applied for detecting PD with AUC similar to Alzheimer Disease vs NC detection shown previously (AUC=0.73 for hippocampal grading in AD, Coupe et al, 2015). Midbrain area of the population-specific anatomical average of T1w scans from PPMI dataset with colour labels showing substantia nigra navy and turquoise) and subthalamic nucleus (green and yellow) used to calculate grading scores. Grading distribution across STN and SN. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for classification between PD and NC based on grading of each structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→