MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537487225 · doi:10.1109/itw.2004.1405326

Broadcasting with fidelity criteria

2005· article· en· W2537487225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueManufacturing Engineer · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCombinatoricsDistortion (music)SigmaMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the problem of broadcasting an i.i.d. source sequence X = {X/sub i/} /sub i=1//sup N/ (possibly N /spl rarr/ /spl infin/) to n listeners over a discrete broadcast channel, consisting of n channels with capacities C/sub 1/ = C/sub max/ /spl ges/ C/sub 2/ /spl ges/.../spl ges/ C/sub n/ = C/sub min/. Let the tuple D = (D/sub 1/, D/sub 2/,...,D/sub n/) represent the average distortion in reconstructing sources at the n listeners. The problem of characterizing all achievable tuples D is still open for a general case. For a fairly general class of discrete channels, we prove the achievability of the tuple n(/spl rho//sub 1/,/spl rho//sub 2/,...,/spl rho//sub n/) = (D/sub X/(/spl rho//sub 1/C/sub 1/ /spl zeta/), D/sub X/(/spl rho//sub 2/C/sub 2/ - /spl zeta/),...,D/sub X/(/spl rho//sub n/C/sub n/ - /spl zeta/)), provided that /spl lambda//sub i/ = (/spl rho//sub i/C/sub i/ - /spl rho//sub i/+/sub 1/C/sub i+1/)/C/sub i/ > 0, for 1 /spl les/ i /spl les/ n $1, /spl lambda//sub n/ = /spl rho//sub n/ and /spl Sigma//sub i=1//sup n-1/ /spl lambda//sub i/ /spl les/ 1, where D/sub X/ (R) is the distortion rate function of X. The penalty term /spl zeta/ = 1/2 for a general source with real alphabets and is /spl zeta/ = 0 if X is progressively refinable. The factor 0 < /spl rho//sub i/ /spl les/ 1 is called the utilization of the i/sup th/ channel. As an example, for n = 2, we show that /sup 2/(1/(2 - C/sub 2//C/sub 1/), 1/(2 $C/sub 1//C/sub 2/)) is achievable for any C/sub 1/, C/sub 2/. Furthermore, the common utilization of /spl rho/ = (1 + ln(C/sub max//C/sub min/))/sup -1/ is shown to be achievable for all channels. Conversely, we find examples of channels, namely erasure switch-to-talk channels, for which the proposed achievable utilizations are tight. In particular, while /sup 3/ (2/3, 2/3, 2/3) is achievable for any compatible broadcast channel with capacities C/sub 1/ = 2C/sub 2/ = 2C/sub 3/, for any /spl delta/ > 0, we find examples of channels for which /sup 3/(2/3+/spl delta/,2/3+/spl delta/,2/3+ /spl delta/) is not achievable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it