MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537602063 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.754

P2‐214: Living with mild cognitive impairment

2015· article· en· W2537602063 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Underwood

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsAlzheimer Society London MiddlesexAlzheimer Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive impairmentCognitionPsychologyGerontologyCognitive psychologyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) refers to a decline in cognitive abilities which is greater than expected for normal aging but not severe enough to markedly interfere with a person's ability to manage their daily abilities. About 1 in 10 adults over the age of 65 years of age has MCI and recognizing MCI represents an opportunity for early intervention that could impact quality of life as well as prevent or delay the onset of dementia. In 2012 the Alzheimer Society London and Middlesex began facilitating a program to support individuals living with (MCI) entitled “Learning the Ropes.” This 6 week program, developed at Baycrest Hospital, aims to optimize cognitive health through lifestyle choices, memory training and psychosocial support. The content of this evidence based program includes formal instruction, interactive discussion and participation in training exercises. The program is delivered by Registered Social Workers at ASLM, tutored and trained by Dr. J. Fogarty, London Health Sciences Centre and Dr. Kelly Murphy, Baycrest Hospital. Since its inception 60 participants have completed the program, which includes the individual with a diagnosis of MCI and their family member or friend. The five ‘ROPES’ strategies are taught and emphasized throughout the 6 week session in addition to lifestyle and memory health education. As a result of the success of the MCI Program we have created an MCI Alumni Group to allow participants to obtain education and ongoing support. This group was in direct response to the participant's interest in continued opportunities to apply their new learning, to support one another and to obtain continued education on developments in the MCI community. Research shows that people with MCI can acquire new information and apply that learning to improve their performance on cognitive tasks and improvements in risk factors are associated with reduced dementia prevalence. Engaging in the Learning the Ropes program assists participants in making positive changes to promote their health and everyday memory to optimize their experience as a person living with MCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207