MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538122063 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444482

An efficient INS/GPS impulse response model for bridging GPS outages

2009· article· en· W2538122063 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed El-Diasty, Spiros Pagiatakis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
KeywordsGPS/INSGlobal Positioning SystemInertial navigation systemKalman filterImpulse responseComputer scienceTime to first fixTransfer functionControl theory (sociology)GPS disciplined oscillatorFrequency domainTime domainAssisted GPSGeodesyGPS signalsEngineeringInertial frame of referenceGeographyMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePhysicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of Inertial Navigation System (INS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) architectures can be achieved through the use of many time-domain filters such as, extended Kalman, unscented Kalman, divided difference, and particle filters. The main objective of these filters is to achieve precise fusion of the data from GPS and INS to provide INS-only navigation solution during GPS outages. The prediction mode performance of all state-of-the-art time-domain filters is poor with significant drift in the INS-only solution. In this paper, a new frequency-domain dynamic response method is proposed to model the INS/GPS system. The input to this dynamic system is the INS-only solution and the output is the INS/GPS integration solution that help derive the transfer function. The discrete Inverse Least Squares Frequency Transform (ILSFT) of the transfer function is applied to estimate the impulse response of the INS/GPS system. It is shown that the long-term motion dynamics are recovered by 72%, 42%, 75%, and 40% for north velocities, east velocities, north positions, and east positions respectively when compared with INS-only solution (prediction mode of the INS/GPS filter).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207