MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2539559280 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2010.5935746

Dynamic elastography using delay compensated and angularly compounded high frame rate 2D motion vectors

2010· article· en· W2539559280 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Zahiri Azar, Ali Baghani, Septimiu E. Salcudean, Robert Rohling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomFrame rateMotion estimationElastographyComputer visionComputer scienceSpeckle patternAcousticsMotion compensationPhysicsArtificial intelligenceOpticsUltrasound

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new ultrasound-based system for high frame rate measurement of periodic motion in 2D for tissue elasticity imaging. The system acquires the RF signals from the region of interest from multiple steering angles in order to reconstruct the 2D motion from ID estimation along each angle. To increase the temporal resolution, the acquisition area is divided into groups of scan lines called sectors. Each sector is acquired multiple times before moving onto the next sector. Following the data acquisition, ID motions are estimated along the beam direction from the sequences of echo signals. Using a recently introduced delay compensation algorithm, the intra- and inter-sector delays in the motion estimates are compensated to create high frame rate images. In-plane 2D motion vectors are then reconstructed from these delay compensated ID motions. Finally, modulus images are estimated from these 2D motion vectors using planar algebraic inversion of the Helmholtz equation. The performance of the system is validated quantitatively using a commercial elasticity phantom. At frame rate of 1250 Hz, phantom Young's moduli of 29kPa, 6kPa, and 54kPa for the background, the soft inclusion, and the hard inclusion of a phantom, are estimated to be 30kPa, 11kPa, and 53kPa, respectively, for an excitation frequency of 150 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207