MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2540206638 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2002.1182873

Intelligent systems for interactive design and visualization

2003· article· en· W2540206638 on OpenAlexaff
George K. Knopf, Archana Sangole

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVisualizationGestureVirtual realityProcess (computing)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Feature vectorObject (grammar)Surface (topology)Data visualizationCoordinate systemComputer graphics (images)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent systems for interactive design and visualization require technologies that reliably generate surface and solid models from acquired spatial data, user hand gestures and verbal instructions; and seamlessly integrate this information into the overall product design process. The deformable spherical self-organizing feature map (SOFM) is a versatile modeling tool that is able to create 3D shapes from numerous arbitrarily ordered N-dimensional data vectors. The data may be surface points on existing objects or multi-dimensional feature vectors obtained through experimental observation. The SOFM develops a topologically ordered lattice that provides information about magnitude and connectivity between neighboring vectors in the original data space. The shapes generated by the deformable SOFM can be displayed, reoriented, analyzed, and modified in an immersive virtual reality environment (IVR). This paper describes how the spherical SOFM can be used to reconstruct the shape of an existing object from measured coordinate points and be modified using shape transformation techniques for virtual 3D free-form design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207